Do Ad Blockers Remove UTMs? Server-Side Tracking Options

Ad blockers have long been a fixture in the modern internet browsing experience, helping users avoid annoying ads while keeping websites loading faster and safeguarding privacy. Despite their popularity, their technical implications—especially in the domain of analytics and tracking—often remain misunderstood. One increasingly important question among marketers and developers is: Do ad blockers remove UTMs (Urchin Tracking Modules)? Moreover, given the growing constraints on client-side tracking, many businesses are seeking alternatives, such as server-side tracking, to maintain data fidelity and improve user privacy compliance.

Contents

Understanding UTMs and Their Role in Analytics

UTM parameters are snippets of code added to URLs to track the effectiveness of marketing campaigns across traffic sources and mediums. These parameters typically include:

  • utm_source – Identifies where the traffic originated (e.g., Google, Facebook, newsletter)
  • utm_medium – Indicates the medium such as email, CPC (cost per click), or social media
  • utm_campaign – Used to identify a specific campaign name
  • utm_term – Tracks paid search keywords
  • utm_content – Differentiates similar content or links within the same ad

Together, these parameters allow platforms like Google Analytics to accurately track referral sources, understand customer journeys, and measure campaign performance. But the arrival of widespread ad blocking technology has introduced new complications.

Do Ad Blockers Remove UTM Parameters?

In general, ad blockers do not remove UTM parameters from URLs themselves. The UTM parameters are part of the URL string and are technically harmless from a security or performance standpoint. However, the issue arises when these ad blockers prevent the tracking scripts—such as those used by Google Analytics, Meta Pixel, or other tag-based platforms—from loading.

When those scripts are blocked on the client side, even though the URL contains proper UTM tags, the visit data is not captured or reported by the analytics tool. This means that UTM data essentially becomes meaningless unless it’s captured some other way. Additionally, some privacy-focused browsers or extensions might strip query parameters—including UTMs—if their settings are configured to maximize privacy.

Are UTMs at Risk with Privacy Browsers and Extensions?

Yes, primarily with tools such as Brave, uBlock Origin, or Firefox configured with tracking protection. These are designed to suppress digital fingerprinting and data tracking. In some instances, these tools can strip UTM parameters especially if they’re configured to block tracking elements aggressively. As such, while regular ad blockers don’t usually remove UTMs from URLs, privacy-first tools and extensions might.

More critically, browsers like Safari are implementing features such as Intelligent Tracking Prevention (ITP), which limit the window in which tracking cookies can function. Similarly, iOS devices with Mail Privacy Protection are completely blinding email-based tracking attempts, rendering some UTM-based strategies unreliable.

Why Server-Side Tracking Is Becoming More Relevant

To counteract these growing limitations on client-side tracking, including ad-blocker interference and privacy-first browser policies, companies are turning increasingly to server-side tracking as an alternative or a supplement.

Server-side tracking, unlike its client-side counterpart, occurs on the server and is not exposed to the user’s browser directly. Therefore, even if a user has enabled an ad blocker, the collection of event data via the server can often bypass this interference altogether. Here’s why server-side tracking is gaining popularity:

  • Improved data accuracy – Because the data collection doesn’t rely on the browser, it isn’t blocked as often.
  • Enhanced privacy controls – Sensitive data can be managed and anonymized at the server level before being sent to third-party tools.
  • More control – Developers can choose what data to log and send, and when to send it.

How Server-Side Tracking Works

When a user interacts with your website or app, data can be sent to your server—rather than directly to a 3rd-party analytics platform—where it’s then processed, filtered, and forwarded as necessary. For example, when someone visits a URL with UTM parameters, your backend can parse those parameters and store them as part of the session or user profile before any ad-blocking logic can interfere.

Here’s a basic server-side tracking flow:

  1. User lands on a webpage with UTM parameters.
  2. The server reads and stores those UTM values (e.g., in cookies or a database).
  3. Event data—like pageviews or purchases—is recorded on the server.
  4. That data is then sent server-to-server to analytics or ad platforms (e.g., Meta, Google Analytics 4 with a Measurement Protocol).

Techniques to Capture UTMs Server-Side

There are several approaches to logging UTM data on the backend:

  • Middleware parsing – During the initial page request, use middleware to detect and capture UTM parameters.
  • Hidden form fields – Persist UTM values using sessions or cookies and include them in form submissions.
  • Tag managers with proxying – Tools like Google Tag Manager Server-Side help reroute tracking events through your server domain.

Best Practices

To maintain tracking integrity even in environments affected by privacy constraints and ad blockers, consider implementing the below recommendations:

  • Supplement client-side tracking with server-side counterparts for critical events like purchases or sign-ups.
  • Design your server to capture query parameters like UTMs and store them consistently across the user’s session or journey.
  • Use first-party domains for your tracking requests—even server-side ones—to reduce filter-based blocks.
  • Honor privacy laws such as GDPR by asking for consent before sending data to third-party services.

Conclusion

While UTMs themselves are rarely removed by traditional ad blockers, the scripts that depend on those UTMs are frequently blocked. This makes the tracking incomplete or erroneous. Server-side tracking offers a robust solution by capturing and managing UTM and other analytics data away from browser limitations.

Organizations aiming to future-proof their marketing attribution models should consider server-side strategies not just as a way around ad blockers, but also as a method to improve data accuracy, compliance, and speed. By combining both client- and server-side tracking—and having the infrastructure to deal with server-side data flows—businesses can gain a significant advantage in today’s privacy-conscious digital landscape.

FAQ

  • Q: Do all ad blockers stop UTM tracking?
    A: No, most ad blockers do not strip UTMs themselves, but they block scripts that read UTM information, making data collection ineffective.
  • Q: Can I still track campaign performance with ad blockers enabled?
    A: Only partially, unless you use server-side tracking to directly capture and store UTM data.
  • Q: What tools are useful for server-side tracking?
    A: Google Tag Manager Server-Side, Segment, RudderStack, and custom-built APIs are commonly used.
  • Q: Will using server-side tracking violate user privacy?
    A: Not if implemented properly. You must ask for and respect user consent and comply with local privacy regulations.
  • Q: Is server-side tracking more accurate than client-side?
    A: Generally, yes. Server-side tracking isn’t affected by ad blockers, script failures, or network errors as much as client-side tracking is.

You May Also Like...